TEACHINGS OF BUDDHISM

March 18, 2008 by gargpk

INTRODUCTION

Sixth century BC was a remarkable one in the history of mankind. It was full of spiritual unrest, and in that period, many remarkable teachers developed their points of views on the philosophy of human life. Among these were Confucius in China, Parmenides in Greece, Zarathustra in Iran, and the Buddha in India.

Lord Buddha appeared as a great teacher in India during that period, and his teachings profoundly affected both religious and moral ideas of that time and thus, acted as a powerful catalyst in transforming the then existing social conditions. These teachings were such a powerful humanist force that within 1000 years of Buddha’s death, the Buddhism had spread throughout India, Central Asia, China, Tibet, Korea, Japan and Southeast Asia.

Although not widespread in India today, Buddhism is still the living force from China to Southeast Asia, and its underlying principles have assumed new significance in the strife-torn world of today. In fact, the concept of world peace based on kindness, humanity and equality, which United Nations speaks of today, are the beliefs embodied in Buddhism.

THE BEGINNING

Buddhism was not a phenomenon arising out of vacuum. It arose out of the prevailing social conditions, intellectual atmosphere and philosophy. These were based on the view points that human salvation can only be achieved by

  • Either resorting to sacrifices, eg, animal or human sacrifices

  • Or resorting to self-mortification, eg, giving excessive hardships to own body.

Buddha examined both, exercised the later one for 6 years, and found both of them as imperfect, incomplete, not conducive to the welfare of man, and so, incapable of serving the purpose.

Gautam Buddha was born in 623 BC as a son of the ruler of Kapilavastu, a Shakya republic in the Himalayan foothills. As Siddharth, he was brought up in extreme luxury, away from all the miseries and pains of life, and had a beautiful princess Yashodhara as his wife and a lovely son Rahul. Only in his late twenties, that too by sheer coincidences, he came across the inherent truths of life, viz, pain and misery of old age, illness and death. Deeply troubled with all this, one night at the age of twenty-nine he left his comfortable life to find out the true way for achieving freedom from pains and miseries of life.

Gautam met all contemporary philosophers and teachers, and even practiced different kinds of extremely rigid self-mortification and physical torture for six years. At the end, he concluded that nothing of this sort was the way to achieve enlightenment or freedom from miseries. During this period, he however realized that he was getting closer to Truth. So, one day he sat in meditation under a Banyan tree (now known as Bodhi Tree in Bodh Gaya) with a resolution not to leave without attaining the complete Truth. In the night, he discovered a ‘cycle of twelve causes and effects’ that make the Universe as it is. No philosopher had ever thought off this law, and bringing it to the knowledge of mankind elevated Gautam to the status of Buddha.

Gautam Buddha contemplated further under the Banyan tree (now known as Bodhi Tree in Bodh Gaya) and came out with ‘four noble truths of the condition of Universe’, and ‘noble eight-fold path that leads to freedom from suffering’. With this, he then left for Sarnath near Varanasi and preached all this to his five earlier companions who had denounced him when he had left the path of self-mortification. This first preaching by Buddha set the ‘wheel of Dhamma’ in motion to end the suffering. This also was the start of Buddhism.

TEACHINGS OF BUDDHA

Buddhism is not a religion. It is a philosophy on the nature and reality of life, and thinking on the real nature and truth of human existence. Buddha recognized the actual condition of existence of everything in the world including the human beings.

  • He first established Four Noble Truths (Arya Satya) to describe this condition.

  • Like a doctor, he then established the cause through Dependent Origination (Pratitya Samutpada).

  • Lastly he established the remedy as Noble Eight-fold Path (Arya Ashtang Marg), which is also called the Middle Path (Madhyam Marg).

These are the three fundamental aspects of the teachings of Buddhism.

FOUR NOBLE TRUTHS (Arya Satya)

As the first fundamental teachings of Buddhism, the Four Noble Truths are as follows.

  1. All existence is full of suffering (dukkha): To some, this Truth may appear to be a pessimistic view of life. It must be understood that it is not so, since pessimistic view of life can only be an individual’s psychic disorder, and so, cannot be a universal view or concept. The suffering (dukkha) mentioned here is a ‘philosophical concept’. One is aware of the commonly perceived sufferings like old age, disease, decay, death, etc. Buddha clarified that even the ‘pleasures and worldly happiness’ also is a form of suffering since their end is certain, thus producing suffering. What this Truth comprehensively communicates is that everyone who exists is bound to have suffering (dukkha), irrespective of who is he or where he is. According to Buddhism, the cessation of suffering is nirvana. This state is beyond logical reasoning or description. It is not a negative condition but a positive one in which mind is totally unconditioned.

  1. All suffering has a cause: Buddha clarified that the cause of all suffering is craving (trishna), especially for happiness – a unique concept.

  1. Suffering can be ended: Buddha assured that anyone’s suffering (dukkha) can be ended, but the only way is to remove the cause, i.e. craving (trishna). This is just contrary to the general belief that some other ‘appropriate’ actions or accomplishments can remove the suffering. Buddha tells that this is just not possible, since the desired effect can not be achieved without handling its cause.

  1. There is a way to end the suffering: As the last Truth, Buddha told that the craving (trishna) can be eliminated to end the suffering (dukkha) and attaining supreme peace (nirvana) by taking the eight-fold path (madhyam marg). This approach of middle path is to avoid the two extremes of ‘ascetism’ and ‘materialistic hedonism’.

DEPENDENT ORIGINATION (Pratitya Samutpada).

According to second fundamental teaching of Buddhism, the continuous existence of a being is like a wheel of causes and effects. The ignorance gives rise to actions, then in turn come consciousness, phenomena, the six senses (viz. contact, feelings, craving, grasping, becoming, birth), and lastly the suffering. Thus, the teaching of Dependent Origination tells us that that ignorance is the primary root-cause of all suffering.

So, if the last effect (i.e. suffering) is to be destroyed, the primary cause (i.e. ignorance) must be destroyed, and the way for this is the Eight-fold Path.

NOBLE EIGHT-FOLD-PATH (Arya Ashtang Marg) or MIDDLE PATH (Madhyam Marg).

Buddhism teaches us eight steps that remove the suffering and lead to nirvan. Each of these paths is prefixed by the word samyak

that is translated in English as ‘right’. It must be noted that this word does not mean ‘righteous’ in Buddhism. Rather, it connotes ‘correct’ and ‘total’. It is a direction towards being open and attentive to the present. Moreover, each of these ‘rights’ implies and requires the other seven, in the sense that all of these are interdependent.

The Noble Eightfold Path is also called Middle Path because Buddha taught the avoidance of two extremes of self-mortification as well as self-indulgence. He maintained that neither extreme lead to the end of suffering and enlightenment. Only the avoidance of extremes or the Middle Path led to knowledge, vision, tranquility and nirvana.

The eight steps of Middle Path are:

  1. Right view (samyak drishti): It enjoins one to get rid of all superstitions, views, notions, etc that are forced onto oneself, and instead being reasonable, open and flexible.

  2. Right mental resolve (samyak sankalp): With right view, one moves on to acquire right mental resolve, which comprehensively involves ones body, feelings, thoughts, and mind-objects.

  3. Right speech (samyak vachan): Right speech is important since every action is preceded by speech. Words free from lies, anger, abuse, calumny, frivolity and slander are the right speech that is followed by right resolve.

  4. Right action (samyak karma): Abstinence from killing, stealing, indulgence in passions and intoxication is the negative aspect of right action while charity, truth, service and kindness constitute its positive aspect.

  5. Right livelihood (samyak jeevika): As the outcome of right action, earning the livelihood without causing suffering to anybody and through the goodwill of everybody is right livelihood.

  6. Right effort (samyak vayam): Endeavor for mental and moral elevation is right effort. This means discarding the existing evils, preventing the oncoming of fresh evils, developing the good that has not yet arisen and promoting the good that has already risen.

  7. Right mindfulness (samyak sati): It is the constant attention paid to the activities and weaknesses of one’s body, feelings, thoughts and mind. Any slackness towards this invariably leads to some or the other slip.

  8. Right concentration (samyak samadhi): This last step enjoins one to fix all the mental faculties on a single object, which is the chosen path of oneself.

First two steps are grouped under WISDOM, next three under MORALITY and last three under CONCENTRATION.

In addition to the Dependent origination, Noble Truths and Eightfold Path, Buddha also elaborated on practice of the modes of sublime states (Brahma Vihars) and theory of karma and rebirth.

MODES OF SUBLIME STATES (Brahma Vihars)

Buddha pointed out that anger, cruelty, jealousy, attachment to the pleasurable and aversion to non-pleasurable are the vices inherent in man. These cause individual as well social suffering destroying peach and harmony. In order to subdue these vices and promote peace and harmony in individual as well as social spheres, he taught practice of the modes of sublime states i.e. four Brahma Vihars. These are:

  1. Loving-kindness (Metta) : To subdue anger, loving-kindness towards all without exception should be developed and nurtured with sincere effort. This leads to abolition of fear and establishment of peace and harmony among all. Practice of absolute non-violence is essential for this Brahma Vihar.

  1. Compassion (Karuna) : The vice of cruelty can be removed by cultivating compassion all without exception. Selfless service for removing the woes of others is the chief characteristics of karuna.

  1. Joy (Mudita) : Jealousy is the vice that leads to unnecessary competition and rivalry resulting ultimately to conflict. Cultivation of the habit of joy in everything and every situation destroys this vice. This brahma vihar requires greater personal effort as compared to metta and karuna.

  1. Equanimity (Upekka) : Attachment to pleasurable and aversion to non-pleasurable are also universal vices. For the removal of these, Buddha advised practice of equanimity towards everything including pleasure and pain. As all the things and conditions in the world are transient and impermanent, wise one totally disregards attachment or aversion these.

THEORY OF KARMA AND REBIRTH

The theory was established since ancient times in India. Buddha accepted both these concepts. The theory lays down that the deeds (karmas) of this life determine the state of life in the next rebirth. A karma or deed may be mental, oral or physical. Its nature is judged by its accompanying volition. Involuntary or unconscious acts are not treated as karma. However, theory of karma was highly developed by Buddha and later by his followers. Unlike ancient conception, Buddhist doctrine of karma holds that a being possesses the freedom to act irrespective of his acts in his previous births. Existence in any conditions, good or bad, in this life is impermanent. Although existence in good conditions is better and can be achieved by good karma, best is freedom from karma i.e. naishkarmya leading to Arhatship and consequently to nirvana.

Buddha was opposed to caste distinctions by birth supposed to be established divinely according to the karmas of previous birth. He also opposed elaborate rites, ceremonies and sacrifices associated with religious practice. Such acts were not included in the category of good karma by Buddha.

CONCLUSION

Buddha taught everyone to be virtuous and wise without any distinction of any kind whatsoever. His Dhamma is not a dogmatic, elaborate system of rites, rules or methods of prayer but a way of life enjoining purity of thought, speech and action.

All the teachings of Buddhism are an evidence of logical reasoning and practical wisdom of Buddha. These teachings have philosophical, moral and ethical components intricately and inseparably interwoven into a composite whole. It is difficult to understand one aspect of these teachings without understanding the others.

It would not be wrong to conclude that Buddha was the first rationalist of the world who asserted that one was one’s own saviour through actions and master through the will and volition without reference to any outside power. For the last 2500 years, his teachings enshrined in Buddhism have shown the path towards enlightened human life, both at personal and social levels. In the modern world of increasing personal, communal and social disharmony, teachings of Buddhism may be the only hope of future.

 

INDIAN PHILOSOPHICAL SYSTEMS

March 12, 2008 by gargpk

The Sanskrit term for philosophy is ‘darsan’ lit., seeing, that is vision, or view of Truth. The ultimate end of every school is man’s deliverance from all sufferings and attainment of abiding peace by true knowledge. However, each system has its own metaphysical, ontological and epistemological position and, therefore, the conception of true knowledge and liberation.

Madhavacarya’s Sarvadarshan-samgraha written in fourteenth century AD Trans. By E.B. Cowell and A.E. Gough, London, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1904) has discussed sixteen different Indian philosophical systems. Among these, twelve major schools of Indian philosophy are widely recognized. They form two groups:

Vedic systems: These systems accept the authority of the four sacred texts called Vedas that are supposed to be divine revelation of supra-sensuous knowledge. Such systems are called ‘astika’ and include:

Mimamsa (Purva Mimamsa)

Vedanta (Uttara Mimamsa)

Samkhya

Yoga

Vaisesika

Nyaya

Among these Vedic systems, Mimamsa and Vedanta are Sruti-pradhana i.e. primaruly dependent of Vedic authority while the other four systems are Yukti-pradhana i.e. primarily dependent on argument.

Non-vedic systems: These systems deny the authority of the Vedas. Such systems are called ‘nastika’ and include:

Lokayata (Carvaka) darshan (pure materialism)

Jainism

Buddhism, which has four major subdivisions:

Vaibhasika (direct materialism)

Sautrantika (indirect materialism)

Yogacara (idealsim)

Madhyamika (nihilism)

Indian epistemology

According to Indian view, all knowledge is revelatory. Its function is to manifest the object of knowledge by removing the veil of unknown-ness from it without affecting it in any way. Thus, the knowledge presents but does not represent. Cogitation is not cognition. It is a wrong premise to start with that knowledge is constructive or interpretative by nature. If such a view is held, then it would follow that nothing can be known as it is and underlying knowledge is bound to remain hidden forever.

In all relational knowledge, four distinct factors are involved- the knower, the object known, the process of knowledge and the resulting knowledge. The process of knowledge involves the method that relates the knower self with the object of knowledge. Hicks George D. (Theroy of knowledge Vol. XIII, p. 449, Univ. of London, 1948) has pointed out that the knowledge exhibits two characteristics- a reference to a self that knows and reference to a reality other than the self. The former is no less a problem than the latter. The epistemological inquiry in the West, however, has been directed mainly towards the object of knowledge. The questions that mainly concern Indian epistemology are:

What is the nature of knowledge.

What is the origin of knowledge.

How does knowledge arise.

What are the instruments of knowledge.

How is the sense-object related to the cognizer.

What is the test of the validity of cognition.

What causes illusion.

How non-existent is known.

What is the way to the knowledge of the ultimate reality.

All the Indian philosophical systems have dwelt on these questions in detail.

Indian philosophers have dwelt in depth on the nature of prama (the valid cognition) and the praman (the methods of knowledge).

Mimamsa and Vedanta

Mimamsa is founded on Jamini’s Purva-Mimamsa-sutra, Vedanta on Badarayana’s Uttara-Mimamsa-sutras. The name Mimamsa common to both, usually means pujita-vichar i.e. proper or rational investigation. In this context, it means Vedartha-vicara i.e. proper or rational investigation into the meaning of the Vedic texts. Purva-Mimamsa (prior investigation) dwells on the anterior portion of Vedas, particularly the Brahmans and is mainly concerned with Vedic ritualism. Therefore, it is also called Karm-Mimamsa or simply Mimamsa. On the other hand, Uttara-Mimamsa (posterior investigation) dwells on the Upanisads and is mainly concerned with Vedic metaphysics, primarily an inquiry into Ultimate Reality or Truth, the Brahman. Therefore, it is also called Brahman-Mimamsa or simply Vedanta.

The philosophy of Mimamsa attempts to uphold Vedic ritualism by a rational interpretation. The Vedas, being the only source of suprasensuous knowledge, are considered the sole authority on religious and righteous deeds (dharma). Survival of soul after death, merits and demerits accruing from actions (karmas), retribution in heaven and hell and the existence of ethical order in the universe are recognized as suprasensuous truths. Performance of rites and duties enjoined by the Vedas rests on these truths. Metaphysical questions regarding the nature of the universe, nature of soul, the laws of karma and the final release from the bondage of karma are discussed to form rational basis of Vedic ritualism.

Mimamsa philosophy has dwelt at length on epistemological and other allied topics for establishment of the infallibility of Vedic testimony. The nature, different methods, validity, falsity, criterion and objects (prameya) of knowledge have been investigated in detail. Kumaril school of Mimamsa and Advaita school of Vedanta agree on the same six means of valid knowledge (pramanas) but differ regarding self-manifestedness of knowledge.

The primary source of Mimasa philosophy is the Mimamsa-sutras of Jamini (circ. 300-200 BC). Later works are mainly commentaries on it and commentaries on commentaries. The earliest known commentary on Mimamsa-sutra is by Sabara Swami (second century AD). Two different interpretations of this commentary by Kumaril Bhatta (AD 620-700) and his pupil Prabhakar Misra (AD 650-720) led to the development of two main branches or schools of Mimamsa philosophy.

Mimamsa is similar to Nyaya and Vaisesika in being realistic and pluralistic in its view of the self and the universe. The realistic view unlike empiricism, recognizes the suprasensible facts. However, Mimamsa while accepting the existence of Isvara, unlike Nyaya and Vaisesika does not accept Ishvara as the efficient cause of the Universe. It considers the laws of karma adequate for maintaining the cosmic order. It further holds that the ultimate goal of life, which is freedom from miseries and attainment of the ultimate happiness called heaven, can not be achieved by self-knowledge but by performance of proper karmas as enjoined by the Vedas. Mimamsa maintains that the purpose of entire Vedas, comprising Karma-kanda (work-section) and Jnana-kand (knowledge-section) is to advocate action and not knowledge.

The term Vedanta (Veda+anta) denotes the end or the culmination (anta) of knowledge (veda), specifically the suprasensuous knowledge (the Veda). Secondarily, it sefers to the concluding parts of the Vedas (the Upanishadas) that embody that knowledge. The Upanishadas, embodying the revealed truths, are the primary source of the Vedanta philosophy. The Vedic seers only revealed the suprasensuous truths. They did not give reasons or arguments. Thereofore, the need to systematize the Upanishadic teaching was felt. Among several attempts, the earliest one available now is Badrayana Vyasa’s Brahma-sutras (circ. 550 BC). It is highly esteemed as authoritative by all schools of Vedanta and every school has a commentary on it to corroborate its views. Brahman-sutras form the basis of Vedanta as a rational philosophy and the term ‘Uttara-Mimamsa’ strictly applies to this treatise. The third stage of Vedanta is marked by the Bhagvad-gita. It particularly dwells on the application of the Upanishadic teachings to the practical life enunciating spiritual and moral disciplines for different types and grades of seekers and points out the way to conform normal life to the highest ideal. The Upnishadas, Brahma-sutras and Bhagvad-gita form the triple basis of Vedanta (Prasthan-tray). They are respectively called the Sruti-prasthana, the Nyaya-prasthana and the Smriti-prasthana Vedanta as they follow the course of Revelation (Sruti), reason (nyaya) and regulation of life (smriti).

Vedanta philosophy is realistic but not pluralistic. It has two main divisions and their classification into different schools is as follows:

Monoistic (Non-dualistic) Advaita Vedanta

Vivarna School

Vachaspati School

Monotheistic Vedanta

Vishishtadvaita (qualified nondualism) School of Ramanuja

Shuddhadvaita (pure nondualism) School of Vallabhacharya

Achintya-bhedabheda (incomprehensible difference-nondifference)) School of Sri Chaitanya

Dvaita (dualism) School of Madhvacharya

Dvaitadvaita (dualism in nondualism) School of Nimbarka

Each system of Vedantic philosophy is essentially an interpretation of the Brahamn-sutras supported by commentaries on Upanashidas and Bhagvad-gita. Each school has original writings also to elaborate on the teachings of the three primary works to confirm to its views.

In contrast to Mimamsa, the Vedanta, particularly Advaita Vedanta, maintains that the ultimate goal of life is to attain liberation (Moksha) i.e. freedom from the state of separation of self (Jivatma) from the uncaused, eternal and universal consciousness (Brahma). The heaven attainable by karma can not be final, for whatsoever is produced must come to end. The eternal, uncaused can not be the product of karma. Vedanta maintains that the work-section of the Vedas is preparatory to knowledge-section that leads to Self-knowledge, which is the direct means to liberation (Moksa) and the purport of both the sections.

Gaudapada ( circ. 7th century AD) is the earliest known Vedanta philosopher who reconciled the authority with logic and established nondualism on a rational footing. His Mandukya-karika is the first available presentation of the cardinal truths of Advaita Vedanta. He was teacher of the legendary Adi-guru Shakaracharya whose commentary on Brahman-sutras and commentaries on principal Upanishadas gave the firm basis of Advait philosophy. The two main schools of Monistic nondualistic Vedanta were founded on his commentary on Brahman-sutras.

According to Monistic Vedanta, the sole Reality is attributeless (Nirguna) Brahman that is Pure Being-Consciousness-Bliss, the One without a second. It is Nirguna (without any attribute) and Nirvishesha i.e. without differentiation of any kind whatsoever, without even the distinction of substance and attribute. On the other hand, Monotheistic Vedanta maintains that the fundamental Reality is attribute-having (Saguna) Brahman that is the repository of all blessed qualities. It is the Omniscient, Omnipotent, Omnipresent Supreme Being. The individual selves (the jivas) and the inanimate world (jagat), though ever distinct from the Supreme Ruler (Ishvar), have no existence apart from Him. Thus in the Vedanta philosophy, there is no absolute dualism as maintained by Samkhya philosophy. Even the monotheistic Dvaita school of Madhavacharya is not dualistic in the sense in which Samkhya is. All the schools of Vedanta hold that the individual self (jiva) is intrinsically conscious. Monotheistic Vedanta holds that the jiva is distinct yet akin to Brahman, thus emphasizes their relationship. On the other hand, Advaita Vedanta though recognizes the monotheistic position, does not recognize it as ultimate. It maintains that the Jive and Brahman are essentially identical and the distinction between the two is adventitious not absolute.

The monotheistic schools of Vedanta are better known as schools of Vaishnavism. The metaphysical distinctions among the five monotheistic schools consist of subtle differences in their conceptions of the relationship between the jiva (individual self) and Brahman (the Supreme Self). All the schools recognize the difference between jiva and Brahman but hold that the difference does not mean that the two are separate or altogether dissimilar. All maintain the position that it a difference in the presence of non-difference. Ramanuja (1017-1137 AD), Vallabha (1479-1531 AD)and Sri Chaitanya (1485-1533 AD) have emphasized the non-difference while Madhava (1199-1276 AD) emphasizes the difference. Nimbarka (11th century AD) balances the difference and non-difference.

Ramanuja accepts that ultimate reality is the unity of Brahman. However, he views Brahman as differentiated (savishesha) and characterized by internal distinctions. Conscious selves and non-conscious nature belong to Him as integral parts. He is the sole reality inclusive of them all, being their innermost Self and Ruler. According to Vallabha’s pure nonduailsim, the Supreme Being (Brahman) is unassociated with maya is, therefore, pure. Brahman creates the manifold out of Himself by His inherent knowledge and power without undergoing any change whatsoever,. Consequently, the individual selves (jivas) are non-different from Supreme Being (Brahman). The Chaitanya’s school holds that the relation between the jiva and Brahman is inexplicable like the relation of the power and the possessor of power. The two are distinct but inseparable. The world and jiva are manifestations of the power of Brahman. Being the manifestation of His power, jiva is neither one with Him nor different from Him. According to Madhavacharya, God (Pramatman) the individual selves and prakriti (the potential cause of physical and psychical iniverse) with their fivefold differences are ultimately real. The difference between God and the individual self, between individual self and prakriti, between two individual selves and between tow categories of prakriti endure forever. However, God is the only independent entity. Individual selves and prakriti have no independent existence apart from Him. Nimbarka maintains that ultimate reality is God who remains unchanged in Himself and only undergoes transformations through His energies as conscious and unconscious. He manifests itself as the jiva without losing His fullness and perfection. The relation between the two is somewhat like that between the sun and its radiance. The relation between God and the world is like that of a snake and its coiled existence. The coiled condition of a snake is neither different from it nor absolutely different from it.

Thus, monotheistic views are in contrast to Shankara’s simple nondualism (Kevala-advaita). This tradition of Advaita maintains that jiva and manifold are the result of Brahman becoming associated with maya. In order to explain the nature of jiva and its relation to ajnana, various theories, based on the authority of Sankara’s commentary on Brahma-sutras, have been propounded by later Advaita philosophers.

Broadly, Advaita philosophy views knowledge in its empirical and metaphysical aspects. Its epistemology is inseparable from metaphysics. It asserts that consciousness is self-luminous, self-existent and prior to every form of existence. Fundamentally, knowledge is Pure Consciousness beyond the relativity of knower and the known. The non-relational, nondual Pure Consciousness is the ultimate Reality. Being is identical with Pure Consciousness. Advait views relational knowledge as an expression on Pure Consciousness through a mental mode of the cognizer, the knowing self. It may be psychological through internal cognition or psychophysical through sense perception. The same Pure Consciousness is individualized as the knowing self, being manifest through a particulaaar mode of mind characterized by ‘I-ness’.

The Advaita explains the appearance of the splitting of Nondual Consciousness that is self into cognizer, cognition and the object cognized as being apparent and the work of Maya. This really says that the situation is inexplicable. The empirical situation that demands the distinction of cognizer, cognition and the cognized object, does not admit of a satisfactory explanation. Adviata shows that the problem is inexplicable at the level of relative experience. This problem vanishes by itself when this level is transcended in the nondual experience. Advaita maintains that any epistemological analysis can be useful in so far it makes us aware of this truth. It holds that the aim of an exposition of the pramanas (means of valid knowledge) is to demonstrate their insufficiency and relative nature.

The classical mannual of Advaita epistemology is Vedanta-paribhasha of Dharmaraja Adhvarin. In empirical matterns, Advaita follows the Bhatta school of Mimamsa and recognizes six means of valid knowledge (pramanas):

  1. Perception (pratyaksha)

  2. Inference (anumana)

  3. Verbal testimony (Shabda)

  4. Comparision (upmana)

  5. Postulation (Arthapatti)

  6. Non-apprehension (anuplabdhi)

Among these six methods, perception is considered of special importance as it is supposed to give immediate knowledge while others give only mediate knowledge. However, in sense perception there is intervention of a sense organ between the subject and the object. Thus, the knowledge gained is really not so immediate. Even in internal perception through the mind, the situation is not so straightforward. Bhamati tradition of Advaita considers mind a sense organ while Vivarna tradition holds that the mind is not a sense organ but an auxillary to all types of knowledge. According to Advaita the knowledge of self that is liberation from the illusory bondage of duality is only similar to perceptual knowledge as even perceptual knowledge is not so immediate as the knowledge of self.

According to Bhamati tradition, even in internal perception there is operation of the sense organ of mind. The final release is achieved only when mind has taken on the mode of the impartite self (Akhandakara-vritti) through continued meditation. However, this mode subsides after having accomplished its aim and then only nondual self remains. Vivana tradition, on the other hand, holds that the final release is gained by the knowledge obtained through the verbal testimony (Shabda) of major texts of Upanishadas that teach nondifference of the so-called individual self from the Supreme Self. The verbal testimony gives mediate knowledge if the object of knowledge is remote but gives immediate knowledge if the object is immediate. Since there is nothing more immediate than the self, the verbal testimony gives immediate knowledge of self. Other means of valid knowledge are useful only in so far they can render intelligible the mediate knowledge of the self.

The intuitive experience called ‘Self-realization’ is considered not infra-rational but supra-rational. Reasoning is necessary aid in the process of inquiry. Rational reflection occupies a strategic place during study (sravan), reflection (manana) and meditation (nididhyasana). Advaita maintains that unreasoned belief or acceptance of authority is useless. Even scripture becomes authoritative only when its truth gets corroborated in personal experience.

According to Vedanta, there are two approaches to ultimate goal of life i.e. liberation (1) Jnana-yoga- the path of onowledge and (2) Bhakti-yoga- the path of devotion. The Karma-yoga or the path of performing necessary work without being attached to the result of work is preparatory to both of these. The path of knowledge is search of Nirguna Brahman and is characterized by the aspirant’s awareness of the identity of the self with Brahman. The path of devotion, on the other hand is search of Saguna Brahman and is characterized by the aspirant’s awareness of his relationship with Brahman. All schools of Vedanta recognize the path of devotion as the direct way to the realization of Saguna Brahman. While monotheistic Vedanta considers it to be the final stage, Nondualistic Vedanta maintains that this stage leads further to the path of knowledge that is the only direct means of realization of Nirguna Brahman.

Samkhya and Yoga

Samkhya system is supposed to be given by sage Kapil (6th century BC) in his Samkhya-pravachana-sutram consisting of 527 aphorisms in six chapters. Most celebrated works of Samkhya are Samkhya-karika (seventy verses) of Ishwar Krishna (3rd century AD) and commentary on it by Vachaspati Misra (850 AD) The Tattvakaumudi.

Samkhya is a realistic-dualistic system in that it maintains two ultimate principles: (1) Purusha and (2) Prakriti. Purusha is the self-intelligent subject and changeless. There are many Purusha. Prakriti is the changeful, non-intelligent, potential cause of the objective universe. Prakriti is one, though manifold. Prakriti is trigunatmaka i.e. has three basic attributes Satva, Rajasa and Tamasa. The whole objective universe- both physical and psychical- evolves from Prakriti when it comes in association with Purusha. This association results in evolution of twenty four categories, including subordinate ones. Thus, Sakhya recognizes twenty-five categories (tattvas) or principles including Purusha. These are:

  1. Purusha

  2. Prakriti

  3. Mahat (lit. the great principle, also called ‘Buddhi’, the universal intellectual principle underlying self-consciousness)

  4. Ahamkara (the ego-principle)

  5. Manas (mind)

  6. Five tanmatras (the subtle elements: sound, smell, touch, colour and taste)

  7. Five drvayas (the gross elements: akasha, vayu, agni, jala and prithvi)

  8. Five gyanendriyas (the sense organs of hearing, smell, touch, sight and taste

  9. Five karmendriyas (the organs of the actions of speech, prehension, movement, excretion and reproduction)

According to the dualistic Samkhya system, the self-intelligent purusa and the non-intelligent prakriti are two distinct fundamental principles. Purusas are many but prakriti is one. The nature of purusa is consciousness pure and simple and changelessness. Prakriti is the origin of all psychical and physical elements, is altogether devoid of consciousness and is subject to change in the proximity of purusa.

The Samkhya, to a large extent, forms the philosophical basis of Yoga as a method of self-realization. In the Samkhya-Yog view, all psychical and physical objects from mahat to karmendriyas are successively evolved transformations (parinama) of prakriti. Thus, there are twenty-four categories of objects, including prakriti. The first and finest product of prakriti is mahat also called buddhi-satva, the pure mind-stuff in which the principle of sattva is predominant. It is transparent and pervasive in nature. Purusa, being reflected in mahat is identified with it and both take up the characteristics of each other because of this association. Thus the intrinsically non-intelligent mahat (buddhi-sattva) appears to be intelligent and conscious while intrinsically changeless, pure, free, luminous consciousness that is purusa undergoes changing states like pleasure and pain, knowledge and ignorance, vice and virtue, freedom and bondage etc., which are the modes of buddhi-satva. Due to this association the purusa turns out to be ‘the seer’ or experiencer (drishta) while prakriti to e ‘the seen’ or the experienced (drishya). However, all the transformation of prikriti is for the experience and the liberation of ‘the seer’.

Thus, the erroneous identification of the self with the non-self is the primary cause of the miseries, according to Samkhya-Yog and also Vendanta. Like a pure crystal appearing red in the proximity of red flower, the ‘seer’ (drishta) appears and assumes itself to be bound to prakriti and its modifications in association with them, the closest association being with buddhi-sttva. The liberation of the self thus, means its complete withdrawl and aloofness from prakriti and its transformations, gross and subtle. This is achieved through sharp distinction of self from the non-self, particularly from buddhi-sattva. Preparatory practices followed by keen introspection and intense meditation lead to this end. Vedanta agrees with Samkhya-Yog as far as the necessity of distinction between self and non-self for the liberation is concerned. However, the Vedantic has quite different view of liberation and the proximate method of its attainment.

The most important difference between Samkhya and Yog is regarding the view of God. Samkhya does not recognize any ever-free, eternal, Creator God because existence of anything like this can not be established by logical proof. The only God it admits is ‘Kalp-niyamaka-Ishvara’ that is a nearly perfect being temporarily in-charge of a cycle of creation. When the association of Purusha and Prakriti is destroyed, the Purusha is liberated and the objective universe created for that Purusha automatically returns to undifferentiated state of inactive Prakriti. Only the knowledge brings about liberation. In contrast to Samkhya, Yoga admits a Personal God, a special Being untouched by any kind of misery, having infinite knowledge and unlimited by time. Such a God is the teacher of even the earliest teachers.

References to the practices of Yoga are found in Upanishadas, Bhagwata-gita and also in Jain and Buddist literature. However, Panini is credited with giving the first systematic exposition of Yoga in his Yoga-sutras. Most widely known commentary on Panini’s work are Vyasa-bhashya (4th century AD) and Bhojadeva’s Raj-martanda.

The practice of concentration on the gross physical objects develops the capability of fixing mind on finer and finer entities, the finest being prakriti. The three main stages of meditation mentioned by Patanjali are:

  1. Meditation on the grahya (the sensible objects to be known)

  2. Meditation on the grahana (the instruments of knowledge, sense-organs and mind)

  3. Meditation on the grahita (the knowing self, the experiencer)

By concentration on any single object of the triad, when all other thoughts are eliminated, the mind-stuff becomes absorbed in it and is imbubed with it like a pure crystal that assumes the colour of whatsoever object it is set on. Thus, the practitioner enters into different states of ‘samprajnata samadhi’ in which the object of meditation is known definitely, free from doubts and misconceptions. In this samadhi, a single thought prevails in the mind, which is not therefore, content-less like in the samprajnata samadhi. Patanjali thus, distinguishes between meditation (dhyan) and samadhi:

Meditation is the uninterrupted concentration of thought on its object. This itself turns into samadhi when the object alone shines and the thought of meditation (and the meditator) is lost, as it were.’

As aresult of intense meditation on subtle entities (prakriti and its finer transformations, except the five gross elements), when the mind goes beyond contemplation (vichara) becoming refined and transparent, the practitioner develops intuitive knowledge. In that state, knowledge is said to be “truth-bearing”. This knowledge is of a different order than the knowledge gained from inference and the scriptures because it being supra-conscious experience, is definite.

The cause of the identification of the self with buddhi-sattva is avidya (wrong perveption). In deep meditation on grahita, the experiencer, the distinction between them is discerned. A clear and steady perception of the distinction between self and buddhi-sattva is called vivek-khyati (discriminating knowledge). This vivek-khyati counteracts avidya and with the eradication of avidya, the idenfication of self with non-self ceases. The self becomes aloof i.e. reinstated in its innate freedom. At the seventh stage of such discriminating knowledge, practitioner reaches the highest level.

Even then the self is not realized and to become firmly established in samprajnata samadhi, power to enter into asamprajnata samadhi is to be developed. Supreme detachment leads to foregoing even the knowledge that the self is altogether different from buddhi-sattva because it is realized that this discriminating knowledge, howsoever high, is only a mode of buddhi-sattva to which self has no relation at all. Complete withdrawl from buddhi-sattva and the knowledge manifest in it results in buddhi-sattva becoming absolutely free from all modes and contentless. Now it becomes perfectly calm and is restored to its pristine purity. This is complete withdrawl of the self from buddhi-sattva, the state of asamprajnata samadhi, in which there is no cogition of any kind whatsoever. The self, being detached from buddhi-sattva, is no longer the ‘seer’ (drishta). On complete dissociation of self, the buddhi-sattva becomes ‘seedless’ and resolves itself into its origin, the prakriti’. The final liberation, i.e. complete aloofness or isolation of purusha from prakriti is achieved.

Nyaya-Vaisheshik

Vaisheshik system is earlier and excersized considerable influence on the Nyaya system. Both systems aim at critical analysis of the universe by logical methods i.e. are yukti-pradhan. In the opinion of Surendranath Dasgupta (A History of Indian Philosophy, vol. 1, p. 282), Vaisheshik system is pre-Buddhistic. Its founder or the first known exponent was Ulook, better known as Kanada who systematized his system in Vaisheshik Sutras. The name Vaisheshik derives from vishesha, which refers to the particularity or individual character of thing emphasized by this system. Nyaya primarily means logic, the process of inference. The system is based on Nyaya sutras of Gautam who is supposed to have lived around 3rd BC.This system investigates into both physical and metaphysical subjects by the syllogistic method. Thus, it includes metaphysics as well as the science of logic.

Though Nyaya and Vaisheshik are separate systems, they have more similarities than dissimilarities. Later Nyaya school, Navya Nyaya, developed as a result of the blending of the two. Swami Prabhavanand has pointed out that the two systems differ mainly in their approach to the central problems of philosophy. The Vaisheshik begins with the conception of being and develops its ideas from that while Nyaya begings with knowing. Vaisheshik acknowledges two pramanas- perception (pratyaksha) and inference (anuman) while Nyaya adda two more to these- Verbal testimony (shabda) and comparison (upaman). These two are included in inference by Vaisheshik.

Both these systems are realistic and pluralistic. Basic postulates of the two systems are:

  1. God is the efficient cause of the universe.

  2. Physical objects exist independently of the mind, although their perception depends on the mind aided by the sense organs.

  3. Seven categories (padarthas) are ultimately real. These are substance (dravya), quality (guna), activity (karma), generality (samanya), particularity (vishesha), inherence (samavaya) and non-existence (abhava).

  4. Only substance (dravya) is independent entity, the rest belong to it.

  5. Nine fundamental substances are- earth (prithvi), water (jala), air (vayu), fire (agni), ether (akasha), time (kala), space (dik), self (atman) and mind (manas). First seven substances compose thephysical universe.

  6. Each Earth, water, fire and air are atomic in their original state and four different types of atoms are their basic constituents.

  7. Ether, time and space are infinite and pervasive.

  8. Self is eternal and pervasive but mind is eternal but infinitesimal.

  9. There are innumerable selves ever distinct from one another and consciousness is neither an intrinsic quality of self nor its essence. In its disembodied state, the self will have no knowledge or consciousness.

  10. The self is bound being associated with the mind, organs and body through ignorance.

  11. Only true knowledge dissociates the self from these adjuncts and leads to attainment of liberation (apavarga). It is a state of complete release from all sufferings without any positive attainment.

  12. Righteous deeds and contemplation on truth conduce to true knowledge.

CONCEPTS OF AYURVEDA

February 22, 2008 by gargpk

Like any specialized body of knowledge, Ayurved is also based on specific concepts about the areas with which it deals. These concepts form the basis of organizing the framework of its practices. Ayurveda defines a human as the assemblage of the five great elements plus the “immaterial self”.

Concept of Self
The Self, as this inner dimension of our nature is called in Ayurveda, is the central point of our being, the hub of the wheel. It is the true inner center of our diversified lives. Thought, feelings, speech, action, and relationships all originate here, deep within the personality. The whole person-and the whole field of interpersonal behavior-can be spontaneously enhanced by the process of self-referral, or looking within to experience the Self. This is analogous to the natural process by which all the branches, leaves, flowers, and fruit of a tree can be simultaneously nourished and enlivened by watering the root. The Self can be directly experienced. Those who do experience it find it to be deeply peaceful, yet a reservoir of creativity, intelligence, and happiness that spills over into all phases of living.

Concept of Panchmahabhuta (The Five Element Theory)
Ayurveda believes that everything in this universe is made up of five great elements (Panchmahabhutas) or building blocks. These are Prithvi (earth), Jal (water), Agni (fire), Vayu (air), and Akasha (ether).

Prithvi (Earth) represents the solid state of matter. It manifests stability, permanence and rigidity. Prithvi (Earth) is considered a stable substance. It is representative of the solid state of matter; it manifests stability, fixedness and rigidity. Our body also manifests this earth/solid-state structure. In our body, the parts such as bones, teeth, cells and tissue are manifestations of the Prithvi. Bones, cells and tissue are physical structures through which our blood courses and oxygen is transported.

Jala (Water) characterizes change and represents the liquid state. Jala is considered a substance without stability. It is necessary for the survival of all living things. Jala is a substance without stability. Jala characterizes change. In the outer world, water moves through the cycle of evaporation-clouds-condensation-rain. It moves around solid matter such as rocks and mountains and it eventually wears away solid, immovable matter. Jala carries dissolved soil and nutrients along with it. A large part of the human body is made up of water. The blood, lymph, and other fluids that move between cells and through vessels are manifestations of Jala. The blood, lymph, and other fluids move between the cells and through the vessels, bringing energy, carrying away wastes, regulating temperature, bringing disease fighters, and carrying hormonal information from one area to another.

Agni (Fire) is the power that transforms the state of any substance. Agni (Fire) is considered a form without substance. It transforms solids into liquids, to gas, and back again. The heat of the sun melts ice into water that becomes vapor under its influence. Fire provides power to the water and weather cycles of nature. Agni (Fire) binds the atoms of molecules together in the living bodies. It converts food to fat (stored energy) and muscle and turns (burns) food into energy. Agni creates the impulses of nervous reactions, feelings, and even thought processes.

Vayu is mobile and dynamic substance. Vayu is the form of matter that is mobile and dynamic. Air is existence without form. We do not see the air that blows through the tree’s leaves, but we feel it. It is a key element required for fire to burn. It can respond to energy, absorb it, and give it off as in a hurricane, typhoon or tornado. We feel air as it courses down our throats and into our lungs. It is most essential for the maintenance of life. Vayu is the basis for all transfer reactions within the body.

Akasha (Ether) is the space in which everything happens. It is the field that is simultaneously the source of all matter and the space in which it exists. Akasha is only the distances that separate matter. Akasha is the space in which everything happens, the distance between things — that helps to define one thing from another. The chief characteristic of Akasha is sound. Here sound represents the entire spectrum of vibration. Like outer space with millions of miles between celestial bodies there is inner space of our bodies between the atoms.

According to the Panchmahabhutas (five elements) Theory of Ayurveda, the human being is a small model of the universe. What exists in the human body exists in altered form in the universal body. Ayurveda believes that everything is made up of Panchmahabhutas (five elements), or building blocks. Their properties are important in understanding balances and imbalances in the nature as well as in the human body. All substances can be classified according to their predominant Mahabhuta (element). For example, a mountain is predominantly made up of earth element. A mountain also contains water, fire, air and ether but the proportions of these substances are very small in it as compared to the earth. So, it is classified as the earth. In Ayurvedic philosophy, the Panchmahabhutas (five elements) combine in pairs to form three dynamic forces or interactions called Doshas.

Concept of Tridosha (Three dynamic forces)
In Ayurvedic philosophy, the Panchmahabhutas (five elements) combine in pairs to form three dynamic forces or interactions called doshas. The term Dosha means “that which changes” because doshas are constantly moving in dynamic balance, one with the others.. It is a word derived from the root ‘dus’, which is equivalent to the English prefix ‘dys’, such as in dysfunction, dystrophy, etc. In this sense, dosha can be regarded as a fault, mistake, error or a transgression against the cosmic rhythm. The doshas are constantly moving in dynamic balance, one with the others. Doshas are required for the life to happen. In Ayurveda, dosha is also known as the governing principles as every living things in nature is characterized by the dosha. Doshas are primary life forces or biological humors. They are only found in life forms (similar to the concepts of organic chemistry), and their dynamism is what makes life happen. The three active doshas are called Vata, Pitta and Kapha.

Vata (Va-ta) is conceptually made up of the elements ether and air. The proportions of ether and air determine how active Vata is. The amount of ether (space ) affects the ability of air to gain momentum, as expressed in Vata. In the body, Vata is movement (a dynamism of the combination between ether and air), and manifests itself in living things as the movement of nerve impulses, air, blood, food, waste and thoughts. Vata is a force conceptually made up of elements ether and air. The proportions of ether and air determine how active Vata is. The amount of ether (space) affects the ability of the air to gain momentum. If unrestricted, as in ocean, air can gain momentum and become forceful such as a hurricane. Vata means “wind, to move, flow, direct the processes of, or command”. Vata enables the other two doshas to be expressive. The actions of Vata are drying, cooling, light, agitating, and moving. Vata governs breathing, blinking of the eyelids, movements in the muscles and tissues, pulsations in the heart, all expansion and contraction, the movements of cytoplasm and the cell membranes, and the movement of the single impulses in nerve cells. Vata also governs such feelings and emotions as freshness, nervousness, fear, anxiety, pain, tremors and spasms. The primary seat or location of the Vata in the body is the colon. It also resides in the hips, thighs, ears, and bones, large intestine, pelvic cavity, skin, and is related to the touch sensation. If the body develops an excess of Vata, it will accumulate in these areas. Vata has seven qualities viz. coldness, lightness, irregularity, mobility, rarefied, dryness, and roughness. These qualities characterise their effect on the body. Too much Vata force can cause nerve irritation, high blood pressure, gas and confusion. Too little Vata, we have nerve loss, congestion, constipation and thoughtlessness. When the movement of air is unrestricted by space (as in the open ocean) it can gain momentum to become hurricane winds moving at speeds of over 150 mph. When air is restrained in a box, it cannot move and becomes stale.

Pitta (Pit-ta) is conceptually created by the dynamic interplay of water and fire. These two seemingly opposed forces represent transformation. They cannot change into each other, but they modulate each other and are vitally necessary to each other in the life processes. In our bodies Pitta is manifested by the quality of transformation. Pitta is responsible for digestion of our food and the regulattion of our metabolism. In the mind, the Pitta is transforms impulses into understood thoughts. Too much Pitta can cause ulcers, hormonal imbalance, irritated skin (acne), and consuming emotions (anger). Too little Pitta causes indigestion, inability to understand, and sluggish metabolism The Pitta is described according to eight characteristics viz. hotness, lightness, fluidity, subtleness, sharpness, malodorousness, softness and clarity. When you boil water on a fire, if the fire is too hot, all the water boils away and the pot burns. If you put too much water into the pot, it overflows and puts out the fire. Pitta is a force created by the dynamic interplay of water and fire. These forces represent transformation. They cannot change into each other, but they modulate or control each other and are vitally required for the life processes to occur. (For example, too much fire and too little water will result in the boiling away of the water. Too much water will result in the fire being put out.). Pitta governs digestion, absorption, assimilation, nutrition, metabolism, body temperature, skin coloration, the luster of the eyes: and also intelligence and understanding. Psychologically, pitta arouses anger, hate and jealousy. The small intestine, stomach, sweat glands, blood, fat, eyes and skin are the seats of Pitta.

Kapha (Ka-pha) is the conceptual equilibrium of water and earth. Kapha is structure and lubrication. One can visualize the Kapha force as the stirring force to keep the water and earth from separating. For example, if we take a pot, fill it half with water and then add sand to it, the sand will gradually sink to the bottom of the pot. (It separates from the water). The only way to keep the sand in equilibrium with the water and separate is to stir the mixture continuously. The Kapha force can be visualized as this stirring force in our body. Kapha cements the elements in the body, providing the material for physical structure. This dosha maintains body resistance. Water is the main constituent of Kapha, and this bodily water is responsible physiologically for biological strength and natural tissue resistance in the body. Kapha lubricates the joints, provides moisture to the skin, helps to heal wounds, fills the spaces in the body, gives biological strength, vigor and stability; supports memory retention, gives energy to the heart and lungs and maintains immunity. Kapha is present in the chest, throat, head, sinuses, nose, mouth, stomach, joints, cytoplasm, plasma and liquid secretions of the body such as mucus. Psychologically, Kapha is responsible for emotions of attachment, greed and long-standing envy. It is also expressed in tendencies toward calmness, forgiveness and love. The chest is the seat of Kapha.

Concept of cause-effect
In the Ayurvedic organization of cause and effect, too much Kapha causes mucous buildup in the sinus and nasal passages, the lungs and colon. It creates rigidity, a fixation of thought and inflexibility in the mind. If not enough Kaph is present, the condition causes the body to experience a dry respiratory tract, burning stomach (due to lack of mucous, which gives protection from excess stomach acids), and inability to concentrate. The Kapha has the qualities of oiliness, coldness, heaviness, stability, denseness and smoothness.

When a handful of sand is thrown into a container of water, the two will separate as the sand settles to the bottom. Only by continuous stirring will the mixture remain in balance. The force of Kapha is like the stirring, maintaining the balance of Jala (water) and Prithvi (earth).

Like And Unlike

Anything that enters our body (microcosm) can exert three possible effects on the organism.

It can act as food. This nourishes the organism
It can act as medicine. This balances the organism.
It can act as poison. This disturbs the organism.
The five elements may exert one, two, or all three of these effects. The rule that governs the interaction between the environment and the organism is the Law of Like and Unlike. Like increase like. Unlike decreases like.

For example, when you lie in full sun, your body temperature goes up. Similarly, when you take bath in cold water, your body temperature goes down. Everything you experience, food, medicine, or poison, increases like parts of your microcosm and decreases those parts that are unlike it. Similarly, thought also enters your microcosm. Thought can be positive or negative and will influence your being. Positive thoughts increase while negative thoughts decrease the well being of personal self.

Knowing what is good and what is bad for the personal self enables one to make informed choices in the life. Harmonious thoughts and attitudes actually induce prosperity while disruptive thoughts and deeds lead to ultimate ruin of the microcosm that is an individual.

Concept of sickness
Ayurveda holds that specific disease conditions are symptoms of an underlying imbalance. It does not neglect relief of these symptoms, but its focus is on the big picture: to restore balance and to help create such a healthy lifestyle that the imbalance won’t occur again. Living in health and balance is the key to a long life free from disease. Perhaps the most important lesson Ayurveda has to teach is that our health is up to us. Every day of our lives, every hour of every day, we can, and do, choose either health or illness. When we choose wisely, nature rewards us with health and happiness. When we persistently choose unwisely, nature, in her wisdom, eventually sets us straight: She makes us sick and gives us a chance to rest and rethink our choices.

This approach of Ayurveda is fundamentally huministic-holistic in stark contrast to reductionist-mechanist approach of modern scientific medicine.

Concept of Prakruti and Vikruti
According to Ayurveda, the basic constitution of a body is determined at the time of conception. This constitution is called Prakruti. The term Prakruti is a Sanskrit word that means, “nature,” “creativity,” or “the first creation.” One of the very important concept s of Ayurveda is that one’s basic constitution is fixed throughout his lifetime. The combination of Vata, Pitta, and Kapha that was present in the individual at the time of conception is maintained throughout his lifetime. This is the base point. Different persons can have different combination of Vata, Pitta and Kapha as their basic constitution or Prakruti. This is how Ayurveda explains the subtle differences between individuals. This also explains why everyone is unique and that two persons can react very differently when exposed to the same environment or stimuli. The Prakruti is unique to a person just as like fingerprint and DNA. Thus, in order to understand a person, it is necessary to determine his or her Prakruti. Ideally, the basic constitution should be maintained throughout the life. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Every person is subjected to constant interaction with his or her environment that affects the person’s constitution at any given time. The body continuously tries to maintain a dynamic equilibrium or balance with the environment. The current actual condition of the body is called vikruti. Although it reflects the ability of the body to adjust to various influences and is always changing, it should match the prakruti, or inborn constitution, as closely as possible. If the current proportion of your doshas differs significantly from your constitutional proportion, it indicates imbalances, which in turn can lead to illness. Farther the Vikruti is from the Prakruti, more ill the body becomes. Ayurveda teaches that the Vikruti can be changed by various means such as diet and meditation so as to approach the Prakruti or the state of perfect health. The concept of Prakruti and Vikruti can be illustrated by reference to our body temperature. When healthy, we maintain an average body temperature of about 98 degrees F. Though different persons may have different base temperatures, it does not change much so long as the person is healthy. When we go outside on a winter day, our body temperature may go down slightly; but will pick right back up to the normal if we are healthy. Similarly, jogging on a hot day can temporarily raise our body temperature. When we are sick, or catch a cold, our body temperature will go up. This indicates that we are sick or outside our normal base condition. We may take medicine to bring the body temperature back to the normal range. In analogy to Ayurveda, our present temperature may be considered as Vikruti and the difference between the Prakruti (our normal temperature) and Vikruti (our present temperature) can determine whether any medical intervention is required. Just like an allopathic doctor will take your temperature and blood pressure routinely as the first step in diagnosing your condition, Ayurvedic practitioners starts with determination of Prakruti and Vikruti as the first step in diagnosing the condition of an individual. Hence, prior to embarking on a journey to perfect health and longevity, it is important to understand one’s Prakruti and Vikruti and determine how far separated these are. Armed with this knowledge, we can map a treatment strategy. This is the basic premise of Ayurveda.

Changing Tridhoshas
According to Ayurved, the three Tridoshas are constantly changing and balancing each other in living things. They make life happen. In a plant, the Vata is concentrated in the flowers and leaves (which reach farthest out into space and air). The Kapha is concentrated in the roots (where water is stored in the embrace of earth) and Pitta is found in the plants’ essential oils, resins and sap (especially in spices which stimulate digestion). Different plants have different concentrations of Vata, Pitta & Kapha. Therefore, the use of different foods, plants, and specific plant parts can alter the body’s proportion of Vata, Pitta & Kapha. Eating root vegetables, milk products, or sedating herbs like valerian, increases our Kapha. Drinking herbal flowers like jasmine, or eating dry grains, increases our Vata. Eating hot, spicy foods like cayenne, or concentrated protein like bee pollen, increases our Pitta tendencies.

Concept of The Six Tastes
Scientifically, finding out a balanced diet requires the understanding of the different food groups, nutrient values of the food and an understanding of the daily requirements of the. An unbalanced diet results in the deficiency or excess of the nutrients in the body. Ayurveda had developed a very simple system of identifying balanced diet for a body. This is called the system of six tastes. Ayurveda recognizes only six basic tastes. It postulates that all the important nutrients that are needed for life are contained in a meal that consist of all the six tastes. The six tastes are sweet, sour, salty, bitter, pungent, and astringent. All the food items are categorized according to their predominant taste. Any meal that contains food items from all these six tastes will be a balanced meal. It has all the nutrients for the proper functioning of the body and will balance all the doshas.

Ayurveda recognized how the six tastes affect the doshas. It, therefore, uses the taste of food items in bringing about the required modification in the dosha status of a body. In the Ayurvedic system, the taste of different food items has central place in coming up with a proper diet in case of imbalances in our doshas or vikruti. For example, a woman who is a few days away from her monthly period, will feel bloated from fluid retention. This is also accompanied by mood change and depression (we call this PMS). Ayurvedically speaking, these all mean that the Kapha is out of whack, an excess of Kapha in the system prior to menstruation period. In order to reduce Kapha, Pungent (onions, radishes, garlic, ginger, cumin etc.), Bitter (green leafy vegetables such as spinach, bitter greens, turmeric) and astringent foods (such as lentils, broccoli, cabbage etc.) are required. Sweet foods (candy bar) or salty food (such as potato chips, salted nuts etc.) obviously will make things worse. Similarly, for a person who feels very angry or irritated (signs of Pitta imbalance), foods that are sweet, bitter or astringent will be helpful. Herbs are also be used according to their taste.

Effect of Sweet Taste

Effect on Tridosha: Decreases Vata. Decreases Pitta. Increases Kapha
Property: Cooling (Earth + Water)
Source/Example: Fruits with natural sugar such as peaches, sweet plums, grapes, melons, and oranges. Vegetables such as sweet potatoes, carrots, and beets. Milk, butter, and whole grains such as rice and wheat bread. Herbs and spices such as basil, licorice root, red cloves, peppermint, slippery Elm and fennel. Ayurveda recommends avoidance of highly processed sweets such as candy bars and sugar, which also contain additives, food coloring, and preservatives.
Actions: Sweet is the taste of pleasure. It makes us feel comforted and contented. It is one of the most important healing tools for debilitating weakness in Ayurveda. Nourishing and strengthening and promotes growth of all tissues, so is good for growing children, the elderly, and the weak or injured. Increases ojas and prolongs life. Good for hair, skin and the complexion, and for healing broken bones. Adds wholesomeness to the body. Increases Rasa, Jala and ojas. Relieves thirst. Creates a burning sensation. Nourishes & soothes the body.
Disorders: In excess, sweet taste promotes Kapha imbalances and disorders such as heaviness, laziness, and dullness, colds, obesity, excessive sleeping, loss of appetite, cough, diabetes & abnormal growth of muscles.

Effect of Sour Taste

Effect on Tridosha: Decreases Vata. Increases Pitta. Increases Kapha
Property: Heating (Earth + Fire)
Source/Example: Yogurt, vinegar, cheese, sour cream, green grapes, lemon (and other Citrus fruits), Hibiscus, rose hips, tamarind, pickles, Miso(fermented soybean paste) and herbs such as caraway, coriander and cloves.
Actions: Creates a feeling of adventurousness. Adds deliciousness to food. Stimulates appetite & sharpens the mind. Strengthens the sense organs. Causes secretions & salivation. Is light, hot & unctuous. Good for the heart, digestion and assimilation. Helps in dispelling gas.
Disorders: Increases thirst, sensitivity of teeth, closure of eyes, liquefaction of kapha, toxicosis of blood, Edema, Ulceration, Heartburn & acidity. Causes weakness and giddyness. It also may cause itching, irritation, thirst, and blood toxicity.

Effect of Salty Taste

Effect on Tridosha: Decreases Vata. Increases Pitta. Increases Kapha
Property: Heating (Water + Fire)
Source/Example: Table salt, Sea Salt, Rock Salt, Kelp, sea weeds.
Actions: A basic unit of electricity, salt helps retain moisture in vata. Helps digestion. Acts as an Anti-spasmodic & Laxative. Promotes salivation. Nullifies the effect of all other tastes. Retains water. Heavy, unctuous, hot.
Disorders: Excess salt can aggravate skin conditions, weaken the system, cause wrinkling of the skin and graying and failing out of hair. It promotes inflammatory skin diseases, gout, and other Pitta disorders. Disturbs blood. Causes fainting & heating of the body. Causes peptic ulcer, rash, pimples & hypertension.

Effect of Bitter Taste

Effect on Tridosha: Increases Vata. Decreases Pitta. Decreases Kapha.
Property: Cooling (Air + Ether)
Source/Example: Dandelion Root, Holy Thistle, Yellow Dock, Rhubarb, bitter melon, greens such as Romaine lettuce, spinach, and chard, fresh turmeric root, fenugreek, Gentian root.
Actions: Considered one of the most healing tastes for many kind of imbalances in the mind-body. Bitter foods and herbs are drying and cooling and create lightness. Promotes other tastes. Acts as an antitoxic & germicidal. Is an antidote for fainting, itching & burning sensations in the body. Relieves thirst. Good for reducing fevers. Promotes digestion. Cleansing to the blood and helps remove ama in system.
Disorders: Too much bitterness can cause dehydration. It can also increase roughness, emaciation, dryness. Reduces bone marrow & semen. Can cause dizziness & eventual unconsciousness.

Effect of Astringent Taste

Effect on Tridosha: Increases Vata. Decreases Pitta. Decreases Kapha.
Property: Cooling (Air+ Earth)
Source/Example: Unripe banana, cranberries, pomegranate, Myrrh, goldenseal, turmeric, okra, beans, mace, parsley, saffron, basil, and alum.
Actions: Astringent foods and herbs squeeze out water. Drying and firming, astringent taste stops diarrhea, reduces sweating, and slows or stops bleeding. Causes constriction of blood vessels & coagulation of blood. Anti-inflammatory. Promotes healing. Has a sedative action, but is constipative. Is dry, rough, cold.
Disorders: Excess astringent is weakening and causes premature aging. Its drying effect causes constipation and retention of gas. Promotes dry mouth. Promotes Vata disorders such as paralysis and spasms. Obstruction of speech. Too much astringent taste can adversely affect the heart.

Effect of Pungent Taste

Effect on Tridosha: Increases Vata, Increases Pitta, Decreases Kapha
Property: Heating, (Fire + Air)
Source/Example: Onion, radish, chili, ginger, garlic, asafoetida, cayenne pepper, black pepper, mustard.
Actions: Stimulates appetite and improves digestion. Gives mental clarity. Helps cure Kapha disorders such as obesity, sluggish digestion & excess water in the body. It improves circulation, is germicidal, stops itching, facilitates sweating and elimination of ama (toxic accumulations). Keeps the mouth clean. Purifies the blood, cures skin disease, helps to eliminate blood clots, cleanses the body keeping it light, hot & unctuous.
Disorders: Too much pungent taste can cause weakness, feeling of weariness, impurities, burning sensations in the body. Increases heat, sweating, can cause a peptic ulcer, dizziness & unconsciousness.

Concepts of Rasayana-Tantra
Rasayana Tantra is one of eight major specialities of Ayurved. This branch refers to nutrition, natural resistance and geriatrics. According to the Ayurvedic concept, Rasayana can be a drug, a food or a life-style (Achara). Achara rasayana forms important part of the Rasayan Tantra. According to Ayurved, a Rasayana helps in strengthening Oja, Bala and Vyadhikshamatva.

Bhel Samhita clearly indicates that there are twelve types of Oja. The Oja is essence of all the Dhatus. It also indicates their sites. The Ahara, Vihara, and Manasa Bhava, if properly used, support Ojas but if abused, they have bad effect on it.

Three types Bala are recognized. These are Sahaj Bala– the power that is naturally present, Kalaj Bala– power that comes with passage of time i.e. season and changes in age and Yuktikrita Bala– power that is provided through therapeutic measures viz. Rasayan prayoga (use of Rasayana) etc. The Bala is influenced by a variety of factors. The Tridoshas i.e. Vata, Pitta and Kapha influence the Bala mainly through the Prakriti. The Agni is another factor influencing Bala. The Prana and Bala, both produced by Oja, are synonyms of Kshamatva.

The Vyadhikshamatva is capacity of the body to limit virulence of the factors producing disease. It is of two types namely Vyadhi-Utpad-Pratibandhakatva (the capacity to restrict the products of disease) and Vyadhi-Bal-Virodhakatva (the capacity acting against the force of disease). Dhatu-Sarat, especially that of the Shonit (blood), Mamsa (Flesh) and Asthi (bones) result in good Vyadhikshamatva. Samhat-Sharira i.e. a well-nit, compact and well-composed body has good Vyadhikshamatva and is said to resist the ill effects of a disease in efficient manner.